SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Captain Jack who wrote (23566)9/24/1998 10:06:00 PM
From: AHM  Read Replies (1) of 31646
 
In spite of a mostly down day - the bid closed at 5 15/32 which was fractionally above yesterday's closing bid of 5 3/8 - the upward swing in the final 12 minutes from 5 9/32 (admitedly a modest 3/16)came as a surprise to me since volume throughout the day was light.

On another matter, the following article is interesting. Does TAVA have a need for such people? Since they undoubtedly have fewer than 15% H-1B employees the restrictions of proving that an émigré does not displace a US citizen's job is waived (next to final paragraph). Foreign language skills may be helpful for their Pacific Rim operations that they discussed in the conference call.

Quote:

White House, GOP Reach Visa Deal
by Pete Danko

7:50 p.m. 23.Sep.98.PDT
The White House and Senate Republican negotiators reached a compromise agreement late Wednesday on a bill that would increase the number of foreign skilled professionals allowed into the United States.
The legislation, desperately sought by high-tech companies who claim a severe shortage of engineers is threatening the industry, could be voted on in the House as soon as Thursday. Supporters are confident of passage.

"There has been a vote scheduled for Thursday, and barring logistical problems, it should be voted on and passed then," said Joe McMonigle, an aide to Senator Spencer Abraham (R-Michigan). "At that point, it can be quickly addressed in the Senate, and move onto the president for his signature."

A bill by Abraham to expand the H-1B visa program easily cleared the Senate in May, but similar legislation had stalled in the House, where the White House joined a mostly Democratic coalition in calling for fewer visas and stricter protections for American workers. With the White House threatening a veto, scheduled votes were put off twice: once before Congress recessed in August and again last Thursday.

Wednesday's deal, brokered between the White House's National Economic Council, or NEC, and Senator Abraham's office, still figures to face some opposition in the House, where labor unions hold more sway than in the Senate. But the White House said gains it made over the pending Republican bill, along with the president's support, should win enough Democratic support for the bill to gain passage.

"They were tough negotiations, and obviously in tough negotiations you don't get everything you want," said NEC staffer Jake Siewert. "But all along we've said we wanted to help the industry address the labor-shortage issue, and we think this bill will do that while also providing the necessary protections, along with the funding for training and education that we think is so important."

Under the new deal, the number of H-1B temporary worker visas will rise from 65,000 in the fiscal year ending 30 September to 115,000 in 1999 and 2000, before falling to 107,500 in 2001. The visa limit would return to 65,000 in 2002.

The return to current levels comes a year earlier than what Republicans had sought. Wording in the GOP legislation called for limits of 95,000 in 1999, 105,000 in 2000, and 115,000 in both 2001 and 2002, before returning to 65,000 in 2003.

While the White House was able to gain ground on the number of new visas allowed -- 142,500 over the next four years instead of 170,000 -- its gains on worker protections appeared more modest. It had hoped to give the Labor Department broad new powers to investigate abuses of the H-1B program, but had to settle for strict language.

For instance, in the absence of an actual worker complaint, the Labor Department will need to have "specific and credible evidence" to launch an investigation of suspected abuses.

"That was definitely the toughest issue (in the negotiations)," said McMonigle, the Abraham aide. "We were able to get language that we think ensures that companies aren't going to be plagued by hordes of investigators looking into their every move. That would have just left them in a worse position than they are now."

The bill does require "H-1B dependent" employers seeking to hire H-1B workers to attest that they tried to recruit US workers and that they have not displaced qualified US workers. However, most companies with fewer than 50 employees, along with larger companies with less than 15 percent H-1B employees, are not subject to that requirement.

The bill does call for stiffer penalties for violations of the law, and assesses a US$500 fee for each H-1B petition and renewal. That fee is expected to raise about $75 million in each of the next three years for education and training programs.

End Quote
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext