SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Who, me? who wrote (6965)9/25/1998 6:39:00 PM
From: jbe  Read Replies (2) of 13994
 
Let us not use the word "liberal" as a cuss word.

Some dictionary definitions of "liberal":

1) Having, expressing, or following social or political views that favor non-revolutionary progress or reform;
2) Having, expressing, or following views or policies that favor the freedom of individuals to act or express themselves in a manner of their own choosing.

What's so bad about that?

Going back historically, the term "liberal" was originally applied to those who stood for as little government regulation as possible. Over time, in popular usage, it has come to be used to designate those who allegedly want a maximum of government control.

Similarly, the term "conservative" was applied to those who wanted to preserve, or conserve, the status quo. It is now applied, more frequently, to those who want to change the status quo, or to change it back to what it supposedly once was (i.e., to "reactionaries").

I propose we get rid of both terms, which generate more heat than light.

jbe

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext