Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 165.07

-1.0%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dave who wrote (15522)	9/25/1998 7:45:00 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) of 152472

"Ericy has stated that the standard does not infringe the Q's IPR and the Q says it does. Both statements are biased, won't you agree? " Bias does not make one wrong. The flat earth and round world societies might both be biased. One is wrong. Yes, Qualcomm is biased. I would be dismayed if they were not. Anyway, saying a standard does not infringe Qualcomm's IPR is playing with words. Of couse a standard doesn't infringe. They could make a standard and test product using totally Qualcomm's products and it wouldn't infringe the patents. It is the act of selling. This sort of playing with words is what crooks do. Clinton didn't have sex with Monica and L M Ericsson's standard doesn't infringe the patents. True. But inaccurate? Also, this isn't an election. The number of patents is irrelevant. What matters is the particular ones of interest. So what if L M Ericsson has a million 'cdma related' patents and Qualcomm has one 5, if the 5 are the only ones which matter? Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next