Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 163.32

+2.3%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dave who wrote (15533)	9/25/1998 8:20:00 PM
From: mmeggs	Read Replies (1) of 152472

I think the beauty of Q's position is that it doesn't have to prove anything in order to build a kick-as* blastin' 3g wireless system. No other company yet has said that they own IPR preventing Q from building cdma2000 systems anywhere they want to. (Though knowing Ericsson this is coming soon...) All proponents of W-CDMA must PROVE (most likely in court, in a several-year long process, if it comes to that) that their system gets around Q's IPR. Dave, it is nice to count patents, but in my opinion that is like arguing about who has a longer [deleted]. The size doesn't really matter. As Maurice said (and you are in fine form tonight Maurice) If ERICY owns a thousand, and Q only five, but ERICY needs those five, end of argument. Qualcomm has everything that they need.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next