SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: flickerful who wrote (53998)9/26/1998 11:45:00 PM
From: HairBall  Read Replies (1) of 58727
 
flickerful: So, why did Reno keep expanding his role? And, don't tell me she could not have opted for another IC!

By the way....I will concede that Reno did not personally appoint Starr. The point I was making is that Starr ultimately worked for Clinton. And, Clinton could fire him for just cause!

And, Reno kept using Starr to expand the investigations...no?

the three-judge panel in charge of appointing independent counsels abruptly replaced him with Starr.

I suppose you would have us believe that the Judges were in the hip pocket of the RNC...right?

Seattle Times....is that another name for the Democratic Party Times?

Now will you go read a few issues of The American Spectator?

Regards,
LG
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News