SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (7114)9/27/1998 2:43:00 PM
From: dougjn  Read Replies (3) of 13994
 
Re: perjury in the Jones deposition. Take a look at this, if you haven't already seen it:

exchange2000.com

There's also the matter of the immateriality of his Lewinsky testimony in the Jones case. That alone defeats the notion of criminal perjury.

I think perjury in his GJ testimony really is a very large stretch in two of the (only) three cases Starr claims (which probably are not what you think they are).

And in the one remaining case become a very narrow and extremely detailed issue of exact sexual contact. Which is exclusively he said, she said. Not a very important or material distinction. And would never lead to a perjury case in a court of law---unless, perhaps the jury absolutely HATED the defendant.

Which may be the nub of it here.<g>

Doug
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News