You're nuts. Starr didn't embarrass me. He embarrassed Clinton, evidently because now Clinton apparently decided that maybe having oral sex with an intern in the Oval Office wasn't such a great idea.
Clinton is the one who is an international embarrassment. Which is one reason he should be impeached: He's disgraced the Office of the Presidency.
You're totally wrong about the reason for the details, and we both know that if they weren't there, you, like those sychophants when the tapes first came out, would be crying "it's all alleged, there's no proof", etc. Been there, done that, on these threads, in particular the "Did Slick Boink Monica" thread. Must I go back and dig up the endless examples of this drivel? "What about innocent until proven guilty, hey, what about that! It's not fair, you can't make a judgement without the proof!".
Etc. It's all there, back in January. So yes, the details were required, to refute Clinton's continual lying.
|
