Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jbe who wrote (5860)	9/28/1998 2:26:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (1) of 67261

How do you prove it (especially if the object of harassment was not penalized on the job for non-compliance)? And if someone is unjustly charged, and even exonerated, doubts about him will probably linger... ah, but what about the patron saint of sexual harassment, and her coven of promoters during the Clarence Thomas hearings? I'm referring to Anita Hill, who became the much-regarded "expert" on sexual harassment, and who went on to command $100,000 speaking fees when she went on the lecture circuit. It's a fine time to start bringing up the difficulties of he said/she said cases. Yes, it's a fine time, now that the Dem's favorite boy has his proverbial ass in a crack. But you're right, the public whipping endured by Thomas over a joke about a pubic hair on a Coke can.......let me just say that I will Never give ground on the issue of sexual harassment: What was good enough for the goose then will do just fine for the gander now. It would appear the Feminists are quite willing to make up new offenses when it suits their political ends, and wipe those offenses off the books when it may cause political damage to their ends. Not gonna do it. The rules are made, now let's stick by them.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next