SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (7244)9/28/1998 6:14:00 PM
From: j_b  Read Replies (1) of 13994
 
<< rather, my position has been when faced with the decision between a competent but sexually weak executive & one that reflects a backward ayotollah-type mentality(Falwell, Robertson)......the former is the better of the two evils.>>

Your position is not uncommon. However, it is also somewhat in error. Assuming that you felt it was appropriate for Clinton to be ousted because of his actions, you would be left with Al Gore, not someone controlled or influenced by the RR.

Even if somehow Al Gore was to be ousted without having named another VP, and Newt managed to assume the mantle, the Republicans would be hard pressed to pass any extreme legislation. Doing so would result in dead adult bodies instead of live Republican Congressmen. The people would literally revolt.

Somewhere along the line, you have to stand up for your convictions. If Clinton has done something that would justify his removal if he were a Republican, it should also justify his removal if he's a Democrat (and vice versa).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News