Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 163.33

-1.0%

Nov 25 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dave who wrote (15653)	9/28/1998 7:39:00 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (2) of 152472

Dave, With respect to IPR, the first comment is: Why is it if someone gets a license for IS-95, they can't use the patents for CDMA2000? You may know something I don't, or one of us is confused about W-CDMA vs. CDMA2000. CDMA2000 is an effort that Qcom is fully behind. I am not aware that Qcom would want to slow licensees to jump on the CDMA 2000 by requiring a separate license. Qcom denied the use of their IPR for W-CDMA which was deliberately design to be incompatible with CDMAOne. Why do you think should Qcom let Ericy to use Qcom IPR free of charge for the sole purpose of destroying Qcom. You know the one about capitalist selling the rope.... Ericy is asking Qcom to give the rope away for free. Joe

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next