SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cavalry who wrote (7257)9/28/1998 11:26:00 PM
From: Arcane Lore  Read Replies (2) of 26163
 
Given that you have not responded to zonkie's questions about Dr. Pettit
( #reply-5863123 ), I assume you have read Janice's post ( #reply-5840982 ) relaying the information that "Dr. Pettit has no knowledge of and is not affiliated with Amazon Natural Treasures."

It is now clear that you have repeatedly brought to this thread a misinformation about the purported relationship between Dr. Pettit and AZNT. If you need to, please refer to the chronology below. One thing that has not, I believe, been pointed out is that the first message concerning Dr. Pettit occurred less than 24 hours after you posted the following:

Friday, Aug 21 1998 2:27AM ET

cavalry just spent one hour on phone with ceo of aznt, it is real, ...
#reply-5553476
=====
Given the short amount of time between your hour on the phone with Sylver and your posting of misinformation concerning Dr. Pettit, many may come ot the conclusion that the source of this misinformation might well be AZNT's CEO. If that was not the case, now might be a good time to tell us just who was the source of your misinformation on Dr. Pettit. Accordingly would you favor us with a reply to the following questions:

Was Michael Sylver the source of some or all of the misinformation in your posts on Dr. Pettit?
If not, was someone else at AZNT, either directly or indirectly, the source of some or all of this misinformation?


As a reminder, here are some of your earlier posts on Dr. Pettit:

Friday, Aug 21 1998 8:49PM ET

that is a fair criteria and i agree with it and thank you for your response
can you find anything on George Petit National Cancer Research institiute
or Andrew Weild
believe they are on aznt board of directors, impressive names imo
cav

#reply-5561088
=====
Friday, Aug 21 1998 9:19PM ET

janice you are all over the place here you are usually much more focused and i am getting dizzy, only sweetener now 127 products on web site, attacking and battling posters, are you the least bit impressed with the fact that dr george petitt and Andrew weild are board members, thought we were here to see if this company is the real deal or not.
j

#reply-5561267
=====
When it became apparent that there was no such organization as the National Cancer Research Organization, you posted the following:

Tuesday, Aug 25 1998 11:22PM ET

aznt bod m sylver, Dr. lorrichio, r. qualey,
advisors to the board i think they are called
George Petitt, NCIA, offices in boston and chicago - ask him about lorrichio, seems they are old friends
Andrew Weild
cavalry

#reply-5589288
=====
Now you have Dr. Pettit belonging to a different bogus organization with offices far from Arizona. Janice was kind enough to post the correct name and organization together with the information that Dr. Pettit's secretary had never heard of AZNT ( #reply-5593899 )

And yet still you persisted:

petitt did advisory work with lorichio and sylver, did you ask him about that
who denied it, post name and phone #.
cav
(Perhaps you hadn't read Janice's post?)

#reply-5619355
=====
No - That wasn't the explanation for your persistence:

until petitt returns you dont know, ask him his relationship to dr lorrichio, ask him if he ever did advisory work for aznt...

#reply-5621096
=====
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext