Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TheRainmaker who wrote (6019)	9/29/1998 12:40:00 AM
From: Achilles	Read Replies (1) of 67261

>>Put down the New York times and get to the issue.. You are persistent at trying to warp the truth..Our law is really clear when it comes to lying to a grand jury..<< I am embarrassed to say that I've never read the NY Times in my life: another disadvantage of being Canadian. It is difficult to 'warp truth' without expressing an opinion, which I did not. Instead, I asked whether you believe that the offenses that Starr alleges are constitutionally impeachable, that is, whether they can be included in your constitution's category of 'treason, bribery, and other high crimes and misdemeanors'. I will have to take your word on your law being clear about lying to a grand jury. It seems to me, however, that an equally important question is whether such a lie would be constitutionally impeachable. >>If you sent your 21 year old daughter to work at the Whitehouse and the President screwed your daughter..did he have a sexual affair with her or not??<< Define screw. ;-)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next