>Chuca, <<they DON'T I just learned>> Who did you hear that from? Our
>paranoid poster has put out a lot of misinformation on this thread in
>the last few days. I'm reluctant to even begin to address his
>nonsense in that it may give it some credibility which it doesn't
>deserve. He doesn't have a clue and I'm not about to help. Maybe we
>should just ignore his nonsense and only address questions raised by
>people with legitimate concerns?
Okay, I'll bite....I've been a lurker for a while, and am bullish on MAXAM. While I realize that by reading a wide array of messages one could probably answer the question Rand is raising, would you be willing to put it all into a concise, single post, that would explain everything from the unrepresentative samples to the 20 pound leech tests? Of course, if I've been observing well enough, I can predict you'll tell me to do my own due dilly ;) but the thing is, potential investors may see your desire to leave Rand's question unanswered as a sign of the answer in fact being that Rand is correct. Now I believe that there are a lot of reasons for why the pilot plant was put on hold, probably many that we cannot even begin to see from where we are, but I doubt that I have the big picture as clear as you, and I doubt I could do as good a job.
Alex |
