SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.
AAPL 255.48-1.1%Jan 16 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alomex who wrote (18660)9/29/1998 6:14:00 PM
From: rhet0ric  Read Replies (1) of 213182
 
It is just that you consider cost only as "adm. cost" whereas
to me cost cutting means chopping everything from R&D to the specific
cost of manufacturing a system as compared to the price (aka.
margin). I'm not an accountant, so I might well be using "cost" in
a nonstandard way


I believe that your method is non-standard for manufacturing
companies, which separate product cost from operating cost. The
standard proft and loss statement for a manufacturing company looks
like this:

Sales revenue AAAAAA.AA
Cost of goods sold BBBBBB.BB
_________
Gross Margin CCCCCC.CC

Operating Expenses DDDDDD.DD
=========
Operating Profit EEEEEE.EE

Gross margin is A less B. Operating profit is C less D.

In a nutshell, Eric is analyzing Apple's numbers in the standard
way, and you in a non-standard way.

I've noticed, for instance, that you talk about the $100M in
advertising costing $50 per iMac or whatever. But in standard
accounting, the $100M would show up in operating expenses, not
manufacturing (cost of goods sold).

rhet0ric
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext