SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.
AAPL 255.48-1.1%Jan 16 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Andrew Danielson who wrote (18675)9/29/1998 7:45:00 PM
From: Andrew Danielson  Read Replies (2) of 213182
 
Another iMac article

mercurycenter.com

This one brings up some interesting new information. First, it states that analysts believe iMac margin is roughly 20%. It does not state, however, which analysts think that or on what basis they do.

Still interesting, though. If it's true, then even my 24.8% estimate sounds high. In fact, a quick rough calculation suggests something like 24.1% net margin if this is true. That would reduce my current estimate to .59-.60.

A few more tidbits from the article:

They put the advertising number at $150 million. I seem to recall $100 million. What's up there?

Repeats the notion that analysts are expecting 400-600,000 iMacs shipping by end of year. But words from Mazzucchelli suggests he may have upgraded his estimates again. First, he estimated $400 million in iMac revenue for Q4 (he also predicted $1500 million total revenue). Then he says Apple might ship 450,000 iMacs in Q1. That adds up to almost 800,000 iMacs by year-end, higher than his most recent revised estimate.

Incidentally, I find Lou's numbers rather questionable. By suggesting $400 of the $1500 million revenue as coming from the iMac, he is by extension implicating a huge decrease in sales of other Macs--a supposition that flies in the face of the market data out there suggesting a 20% increase in sales.

Overall, one of the most balanced articles I've read in a while. Makes the Washington Post front-page spread look pathetically biased (which it was).

Andrew
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext