SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 166.17+0.7%12:53 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gregg Powers who wrote (15788)9/30/1998 12:14:00 PM
From: tero kuittinen  Read Replies (3) of 152472
 
I'm going to make an exception and refrain from ad hominem attacks just this once - it makes me feel morally superior. Can I point out that Nokia has been doing research on W-CDMA handsets for nearly ten years now? I would expect that they know how to build these things. Current CDMA phone manufacturers do not have the basic digital handset expertise and know-how Nokia has - just compare the Motorola and Sony GSM phones to Nokia's.

Like I've said, the quality of phones reflects the money spent in R&D. There is now massive investment in W-CDMA gadgets both in Europe and Japan. And W-CDMA phone manufacturers Nokia and Ericsson have a *proven* track record of being so good at digital phones that they are currently world's number one and number two companies in this field.

The fact that W-CDMA is the optimal *third* generation solution tells us nothing about what is the optimal *second* generation solution (GSM versus IS-95). In any case, even if IS-95 had been the optimal second generation standard, they would have to have launched it in 1993 to provide a real alternative to GSM. It's too late to catch up all those years and all those billions spent in GSM R&D.

All my best,
Tero
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext