SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : CXI-Commodore Environmental

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: KewlHand who wrote (1254)9/30/1998 1:40:00 PM
From: Andrew Furst  Read Replies (1) of 1755
 
I agree completely, KH. This is theft, self-dealing, conflict of interest, breach of fiduciary duty, whatever you want to call it. I'm glad you are notifying the SEC, and hope a few lawsuits can correct this situation (though they rarely if ever do - seems only the lawyers win). If this deal can be done, it can be undone too - the same parties are in charge at each of the 3 companies (CXI, COES, CXOT). CXI's stake in CXOT had a market value of over $30 million within the past year, and now COES gets it for $1.25 million - how fair is that? I'd be tempted to say that COES is a good buy now, but I'll bet the "big boys" will figure out a way to print up a bunch of shares for themselves (easy to do with BB stocks), so a stake in COES isn't safe from their claws either. If the deal announced yesterday is fair to CXI shareholders, it certainly isn't clear from the announcement. They need to clarify this, or announce that the "deal" is a no-go after all. If these people want to steal from the stockholders (assuming that is what is going on here), they ought to at least put it to a vote among the shareholders.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext