SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Graham and Doddsville -- Value Investing In The New Era

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (835)9/30/1998 3:04:00 PM
From: porcupine --''''>  Read Replies (1) of 1722
 
It is historical nonsense that we did nothing early on until
FDR came
along. (albeit universally believed) Hoover despite his
reputation was very active in trying to prop up the
excesses. It is documented.


It is well documented that Hoover made great humanitarian efforts.

I suspect that giving Roosevelt credit for getting us
out of the depression was one part political revisionist
history and one part lack of understanding of the facts. The
credit facts vs. GDP are not refutable though. I have them
in a chart.


Statistical coincidence is not irrefutable proof of anything in the social sciences -- because there is no way to re-run history changing only one variable. Therefore, there are no controlled experiments, and hence, nothing approaching proof.

Only the most partisan advocates of intervention credit Roosevelt with ending the Great Depression. Anyone who lived through it knows it was WWII.

But just letting the system collapse was a prescription for being taken over by the Communists or their Fascist imitators. It is argued by some that government disaster relief encourages people to take unnecessary risks the next time around. But, the political reality is that a government that doesn't provide disaster relief will get replaced by one that "promises" that it will. Often, the replacement government winds up being the biggest disaster of all.

Btw, one of the things mentioned in traditional economics texts is that post-war growth in Germany and Japan was so much higher than other countries because the devastation had eliminated all of the marginal performers in the labor and capital markets. But, even economists concede that that's too high a price to pay for increased economic efficiency.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext