SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR)
QLGC 16.070.0%Aug 24 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Craig Stevenson who wrote (18333)10/1/1998 10:35:00 AM
From: George Dawson  Read Replies (1) of 29386
 
Craig,

Interesting but confusing article. If the PCI-X is a faster I/O bus it would seem like a positive for any connected I/O device. The problem of course is that speed has characteristically increased about 100 fold between the CPU and the I/O bus. This is probably what the Intel engineer is referring to with the "wait faster..." comment. I think we went through that exercise last summer when we looked at how fast disk arrays could read/write data and concluded that they were a lot slower than a Gbps.

The comment about switched fabrics in the future is interesting and I wonder what Intel is up to. There are several proprietary clustering schemes that depend on low-latency routers. Some of them get around the I/O bus speed problem by attaching to the main system bus.

Makes me wonder if Intel is getting into FC fabrics?

George
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext