SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (5838)10/1/1998 11:32:00 AM
From: BobS  Read Replies (1) of 11603
 
<< Besides satisfying the court about IPM debt, the IPM shareholders must also be satisfied.>>

Don't agree with that one. IPM created the debt and wasn't able to generate income to pay the debt. It's IPM's problem, not Maxam's.

As for satisfying IPM shareholders - it's not Maxam's job. The shareholders took their chance owning IPM and it wound up a bad investment. They lost (as did I, only I took my losses the Monday after Black Friday).

As for BRX, Runyon is the principle (or owner?) of Phoenix. IPM's lack of payment for BRX, I asusme, defaults ownership back to Phoenix. If Maxam wants BRX, deal with Phoenix, not with IPM.

It is not Maxam's job to save IPM shareholders. The company failed, the shareholders lost. Period.

bobs.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext