Risk, are you capable of understanding how it is possible to say that this post of yours is one of the most immature and snotty pieces of word contamination entered into "discussion" on this god/no-god subject?
You seem an Emile of a different stripe.
E answered you so nicely a post or two ago - then you spit in her face, immaturely and snottily.
I have asked you a few questions that you deride or ignore.
You have no discussion. You have your premise as Truth - anyone trying to spec your Trusth is, in your immature and snotty view, unqualified to enter a discussion.
Sam, if you read this, I meant to respond to one of your recent notes about not realizing till you were 51 and about God making you aware of the Christ within you, which wasn't the Jesus Christ. My response is: Sam, I didna' know ye! (I got the internal peace/awareness at 23 or 24, after a decade of heavy "research" and, I am sure you will admit to the slyness of this: The Christ that you are is not Jesus (you said that), but it also is Jesus, and E and Rick and George?
Rick, I used to insist, this has been a life-long requirement, that one, you in this case, define God - before you start tossing stale vegetables all over the forum. (I did this back into the Galt days.) Do you have any communicable idea of, can you define, this God, who is your answer to the Ultimate"X"?
I felt you were open to posting. But to go back again over the eternal God-Problem of Evil with such an immature, snotty (and disrespectful) attitudes as you expressed in this post is ridiculous!
I guess I am infuriated because I deeply admire E, and you throw immature and snotty sauerkraut right in her face. Disgusting! gsm |
