Humbly report, All, since it is Sunday, and some of you may have free time on your hands, may I suggest you take a stroll down memory lane, and visit (or revisit) some of this paid tout's past posts, in order to better understand him? One can simply click on his name, of course, Member 4103168
but some of his more interesting posts have already scrolled.
Here, let me humbly help:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: #reply-2082539
As for my theory on why Jews are smarter, it goes as follows. For roughly 1,200
years there were only two avenues of upward mobility for ambitious Christians
looking to move up from peasantdom - either you became a knight which meant you
had to be big and strong and were probably not all that bright, or if you were smart
you entered the priesthood in which case you took a vow of celibacy. Thus, for 1,200
years Christians were breeding out their smartest people.
Meanwhile, Jews were marrying the son of the most successful man in the
community to the daughter of the Rabbi, the smartest man in the community. They
were breeding up!!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: #reply-2089673
"Truth" is not the issue. People can say whatever they want but in my view they
should reveal their motives.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: #reply-2044179
I REPEAT: posters to SI of negative information have an obligation under any
reasonable standards of civil discourse to declare any financial interests they
might have . . .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Needless to say, I absolutely agree with Bill's #reply-2044412 :
Westergaard says: "posters to SI of negative information have an obligation under
any reasonable standards of civil discourse to declare any financial interests". What
about posters that hype the Company?
Westergaard sets his own "standards of civil discourse". His attack on Pluvia was
outrageous.
Let me help everyone out. Westergaard appears to be a paid tout. If so, he has no
jounalistic integrity - he takes money and then promotes the stock. His investment
track record is abysmal. Those who can DO, those who CAN'T sell advice.
This is a simply a publicity stunt to generate "hits" for WIBN.
Without Regards, Bill
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have a lot of time on your hands, you may want to take a peek at the Pluvia vs. Westergaard thread, from the beginning:
techstocks.com
Cheers,
Svejk
proofsheet.com |
