Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pezz who wrote (6988)	10/4/1998 2:58:00 PM
From: j_b	Read Replies (2) of 67261

<<BTW if I seem a little more caustic than usual I apologize, don't know why. >> You are entitled to get passionate about something you believe in, especially since you still remain civil. No complaints here. As far as Starr's responsibility versus that of the Congress, the point I was making was that Congress still has the responsibility to investigate the matters. If they feel Starr has done an adequate job, they can accept his investigation as thorough and complete. If not, they can do their own. The responsibility is still theirs. <<you know damn well the die hard conservatives such as on this thread will never be satisfied unless BC is kicked out>> Absolutely true - I also know that the die hard liberals will never be satisfied unless BC is kept in. The only way both sides will be satisfied is if there is a complete, thorough and fair hearing on all issues. <<what do you think,Star just decided to let BC of the hook on these issues after four years of digging because he likes him?>> Starr hasn't let BC off the hook yet. IMHO (as shown on my post to Michelle) there is plenty of evidence against Bill and Hillary for Travelgate and Filegate to justify including them in the hearings. You may turn out to be right, that Starr couldn't pin those on BC, but the Watergate burglary wasn't pinned on Nixon either, but he was thought to be responsible for the actions of his subordinates. The jury is still out on the other "gates". I have tried to keep an open mind on the issue of impeachment, and I'm still not convinced Clinton should be removed. However, I do think that the partisanship is so thick that only full and open hearings on all the "gates" will save us from years of destructive internal strife.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next