SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Religion on SI
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mark silvers who wrote (1326)10/5/1998 5:14:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) of 1542
 
I wasn't limiting my response to infidelity. I am a father of three daughters. The encapsulation definition applies here to. If we encapsulate the sexual relations to what you are defining as premarital, well why would that be such a big deal for Dad? But if premarital doesn't become marital then it isn't really premarital. If it becomes a pattern of premarital relations, we all stop calling it premarital. Looking back over the last couple of generations, I just don't see the typical situation being described by the participants as a beautiful period of sexual expression, except during the encapsulation. Most people see such things as a learning experience that they don't want to repeat. The difference is marriages don't have to be encapsulated. Have I over used that word yet?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News