Rick, you are a despicable non-tao, non-god, non-nature fanatic...
This inacceptable post of yours is so flagrantly a con job, it causes me to post to you again - despite that I have said I would not.
You say: "It appears both of our minds landed in the same place: Taoism. It works for me Because it is so non-specific, and it is non-specific because it relies on the poetry of natural metaphor."
This could be an honest statement, from an honest person.
Then you say: "This allows the mind (at least mine) to find resonance in the notion of our inability to comprehend the full nature of God,"
This is a valid continuation of your first statement.
And you finish the sentence with:
"yet still acknowledges Him (yeah, yeah pronouns, schmonouns) as being evidenced by the observable processes of the physical world."
Where, in all the tininess or greatness of things, do you get this connection, this "yet" connection? WHERE? HOW?
You have no mind, or you have no ethics. How do you leap such chasms without the thought that it is a leap.
I personally believe you are a deceptive person, offering discourse, kindly and openly, then slamming back to your preconceptions - without any idea of a discourse taking place.
If you had the ability to read Sam's dissertation of a day or so ago, you would be forced out of your singularness. I do not believe you have the ability. I believe you are a fanatic, who schemes and deceives to prove his postulation.
I am afraid of people like you.
geo
ps: CGB, if you want to kick me off your thread for posts like this, simply say so - and I will never contaminate this space again. (I find Rick is completely without morality. Sneaky. Duplicitous. Dishonest.) |
