SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Advanced Gravis Computer Technology Ltd.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: David Krafcsik who wrote (1682)12/28/1996 12:11:00 PM
From: GraviShareholders   of 1780
 
READ YOUR (FALSE AND FRAUDULENT) INFORMATION CIRCULAR.

At the July 29, 1996 Gravis Annual General Meeeting, Richard Groome acknowledged that Gravis should be generating $100-$250 million in revenues at this point in their existence. Richard Groome also acknowledged, in the presence of other dissenting shareholders that Gravis should have a market capitalization in the same range as what their revenues should be at $100-$250 million attributable to their worldwide shelfspace and critical acclaim and emergence of the GrIP and GamePad Pro as multiplayer gaming standards.

Richard Groome ( magellan.net )personally and as CEO of Groome Capital Advisory (including but not limited to all directors and officers of American Brands, individually and severally, McCarthy Tetrault ( mccarthy.ca ) et al et ux) are guilty of alleged conspiracy, fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, extortion, blackmail, undue influence, violations of corporate opportunity, tender fraud, RICO and US SEC Rule 10b-5 violations, and proxy fraud pursuant to Advanced Gravis' Annual General Meeting Form of Proxy, Information Circular and the Annual General Meeting itself and as sole and proximate cause in the irreparable injury and unspecified damages suffered by the Gravis shareholders.

AS A MATTER OF RECORD neither Richard Groome, nor McCarthy Tetrault, nor Chadbourne and Parke nor Richardson Greenshields have returned any calls to dissenting shareholders despite their fiduciarily bound requirements pursuant to Toronto Stock Exchange, British Columbia Securities Commission and the United States Securities Exchange Commission securities regulations and specific performance and documented promises to do so. Why?

(alleged) CONSPIRACY
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext