WestAmerica Corp. (WACC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : WestAmerica Corp. (WACC)

WACC 0.00

Nov 6 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TA2K who wrote ()	10/7/1998 11:34:00 AM
From: JOE TURMAINE	Read Replies (1) of 749

Nicholas, I contacted "Stockwiz" today to see what I could find out about WACC. I wanted to know if they were still interested in WACC & if they had any information that we do not. Here is the response I received. >>StockWiz is a registered trademark of i-Soft, Inc. The email that you forwarded to us did not originate from us. My best guess is that it came from a company that used to do business under the name StockWhiz.(which was using the domain stockwhiz.com). We had since approached that company and explained to them that they were violating our trademark. They have released the stockwhiz.com domain to us and they now do business under the name of BullTrade (at bulltrade.com). It is also possible that the message came from a group on America Online which does business under the name of StockWiz10@aol.com, call themselves 'stockwiz' and have a web site at members.aol.com or something like that). We have contacted the legal department of AOL and they are going through the process of shutting them down or forcing them to use another name. It would greatly help us if you tell us who sent that message originally. In particular it would be great if you forward that message to us (at isoft@i-soft.com) with all if its headers and content. Best regards, Cynthia Mylton << At least that explains why none of the numbers in the original article were correct. JOE

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next