SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Voice-on-the-net (VON), VoIP, Internet (IP) Telephony
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (1467)10/8/1998 8:24:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Read Replies (4) of 3178
 
Stephen, the IDT-Frontier story made for a very interesting read. I have some comments and a question for you and the thread:

What kind of service classification does IDTC fall into, once the company makes the claim to be able to:

offer broader band IP telephony, national long distance and 10xxx services, reduce 800-origination costs, and provide originating and terminating carrier traffic in all major cities.

In other words, does this take the company out of the protected realm of being an IP Telephony Carrier or ITSP due to its heavy dependency on PSTN constructs such as SS7 and AIN, which makes the 1+ 10xxx possible, along with directory lookups and 800 service? Does it seem to you that at this point IDTC is merely fulfilling the role of an ordinary reseller, with possibly some fringe qualifiers to also include it in the ITSP family? It does to me. But I also feel that this is the inevitable way of the immediate future for those companies who hope to realize larger traffic volumes, while at the same time realizing the efficiencies of IP as the mid-span protocol.

We're seeing futher evidence here of the hybridization process, in other words.

I'd be interested in your views on this, along with those of others, and how you feel this plays into the exemption status of such "carriers."

Regards, Frank Coluccio
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News