Dang it, Iceshark, now you tell me.
You got me all nervous and everything, talk about hormonal mood swings. I just logged back on after diligently researching law of "fair use" of copyrighted material on the web. Well, I'll post it anyway, maybe useful to someone someday.
At least it kept me from buying more beaten up stocks.
Yours,
CobaltBlue
law.cornell.edu is the applicable law, reproduced infra: (not copyrighted)
interesting commentary at
palimpsest.stanford.edu
§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include -
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors. |
