Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 174.80

+0.3%

Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg B. who wrote (16208)	10/8/1998 9:43:00 PM
From: Techteam	Read Replies (2) of 152472

I do not understand the conflict you see in those two statements. My position is 1) The information that is given publicly is insufficient to calculate a per phone royalty. 2) I believe the reason they do not give more precise information is that there is a wide disparity between the royalty levels charged different licensees. Obviously they do not want to disclose this to be the case. 3) Some licensees may be paying the levels that have been suggested on this thread. My sources indicate that some of the larger suppliers with their own intellectual property are paying substantially lower net rates bringing the average royalty well below the numbers that are being quoted here.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next