Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jbe who wrote (8362)	10/9/1998 1:30:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (1) of 67261

Sorry, but I thought I went to lengths to explain my point. Let me try again: The Republican-backed proposal is "Rodino-rules". Which the Dems designed and thought was good for the Nixon Inquiry, which was also about lying under oath, obstruction of Justice, and public lying. So if the Democrat-designed Rodino rules are so unjust, inappropriate, etc, (thought by some of today's Dems), then why did the Dems design them that way back during the Nixon inquiry? The only difference is that it's a Democratic President on the hot-seat? I'm saying that the rules were good then, and they are good now, so cut the fussing.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next