SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 174.80+0.3%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Techteam who wrote (16233)10/9/1998 11:56:00 AM
From: Gregg Powers  Read Replies (1) of 152472
 
Techteam:

There remains a logical disconnect in your position. QC's royalties for Q3 were $46mm. The nominal amount of non-QC handset and infrastructure revenue can be approximated, albeit with some effort, on a quarter-by-quarter basis. You can then compare the magnitude of total non-QC IS-95 equipment sales to QC's reported royalties and derive a royalty percentage. Even the most mathematically impaired observer should be able to derive a royalty percentage that is far closer to 5% than 1% (or the zero that you suggest some are paying).

The company makes no secret that there were royalty sharing arrangements with major licensees such as Motorola. It also makes no secret of the fact that these agreements provided for a bounded amount of dollars to be shared with the OEM, after which the net royalty rate would move higher. The company has never disclosed the exact royalty rate payable by any OEM, for both tactical and strategic reasons. Nevertheless, please explain how QC managed to earn $46mm in royalties in a single quarter if there are a bevy of OEMs paying little to no royalties?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext