Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: j_b who wrote (8566)	10/9/1998 7:01:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) of 67261

Off Topic: Animal Cruelty. << ... but my internal compass tells me that if I couldn't justify someone doing it to me, I shouldn't justify doing it to them. >> It is refreshing to read your note. The use of rodents or feed animals for medical testing doesn't bother me as much as using animals of higher intelligence, such as chimps. Since I value a chimps life much more than I value an unborn fetus, I can't understand the usual conservative view on animal testing. Our scientists could probably come up with testing methods and innovations that could bypass the testing on dogs, cats, chimps, etc. But, since cruelty to animals is an accepted sport for our scientists and product testers, they don't bother to find a more humane method. << Yes, I am one of those compassionate conservatives that actually checks to make sure that products I buy are not animal tested. >> How do you know if a product is animal tested? Regards fellow conservative, Bob

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next