LG, I don't think it was directed at you, and understand why it had no meaning to you.
That's really the tough part about this medium of communication. First, words can only have meaning to the person to which the words are directed, and, next, the words are interpreted as intended by the person to whom the words are directed by the person who/whom formulated the letters into words.
This is sent to you in jest (for the record) in the context of a president who/whom cannot possibly determine the meaning of the word "alone" or "sex". Yet, he continues to have enormous influence (with the billions of dollars we spend for this ability). However, I admire his ability, constantly, to gain the advantage and determine the direction of the argument of the moment. Bush couldn't exceed him in this regard as an incumbant president.
Now then, I have stated that the battleground is IMF. I don't pretend to know the winners and losers, as we don't get a clear advance/decline line, but I'll ask (for insight) how does the governor of Arkansas become president of anything. Excuse me, this dude is running the Lincoln bedroom as a bed and breakfsst.
I agree with you LG, you really should have taken an opposite position, and stood by it. But, back to words, why are you even responding?
Berney |
