But Fred, what you don't realize is that those of us who are proponents would objectively discuss the stock. For example, did I bring up the Zulu Lycos debt becuase I was trying to hide something? But if this role is taken away from me, and I end up defending against 100 percent naysayers, objectivity is harmed, wouldn't you say?
Besides with a .05 price and a penny stock in general, I think anyone who would even be considering a buy would be aware of the risks. Do you know any penny stock investors (i.e., newbies) who aren't aware of such risks? I don't think you do.
So I disagree with you. Perhaps, it's at this time, that the skeptics should begin looking for positives about the company, rather than continually harping on the downside. I mean where's the level of productivity by downing the down? To do so, I contend, means someone has an agenda. Whatta ya think? |
