Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Lacelle who wrote (9025)	10/12/1998 1:15:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) of 67261

John, Is there any way that you could be more off base here? If the same reasoning that everyone is applying here applied to criminal law in general, it would be illegal to question rapists about their sexual activity. It would be illegal to question child molesters about their sexual activity. Rapists, Child Pornographers, people with HIV that go around infecting other people intentionally, etc have all lost their right to privacy regarding sexual activity because the crossed the bar into illegal behavior. Uh theres a large difference here between Clinton and a rapist. That difference is, the criminality of the act itself. If you commit a sexual crime then yes, you have lost your right to privacy. If you do not commit a sexual crime then what are you saying? Clinton committed perjury you say... now what does a G-string have to do with that huh? Do we all need to know the specifics of this? NO. Question for you - lets say I steal a bed from a furniture store. Is is correct in a criminal proceeding against me to delve into the specifics of my sex life then?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next