Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill who wrote (9045)	10/12/1998 1:44:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) of 67261

Oh yeah? Well, you're a big weinie. Mr. Bush said he had asked Mr. Walsh to provide him with a copy of his testimony to the prosecutor, which he would make public. This seems to imply that George Bush testified before Lawrence Walsh. Walsh argued that some of these notes would have had to be furnished to Weinberger. They could have led not only to President Bush being called as a witness but to his prosecution for perjury. "In light of President Bush's own misconduct, we are gravely concerned about his decision to pardon others who lied to Congress and obstructed an official investigation." This seems to imply that Lawrence Walsh thinks George Bush lied to him, under oath. Walsh couldn't prove it, of course, there was some coverup / obstruction of justice / conspiracy going on. Pretty effective one too, as near as I can tell. Neither of the pieces I quoted were opinion pieces. One quoted Bush, directly. One quoted Walsh, directly. Of course, this is not the kind of "facts" and "substance" you find relevant here. The endless regurgitation of whatever got leaked to Drudge this week, now there's facts and substance for you.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next