Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill who wrote (9045)	10/12/1998 4:13:00 PM
From: jbe	Read Replies (2) of 67261

Boys, boys......Now, on this Bush thing... As I noted in a previous post, I think that what bothers a lot of people is that certain instances of alleged or suspected Presidential and/or Vice Presidential lying in the past were not investigated as thoroughly as President Clinton's alleged lying has been. They would argue that Bush could not have lied under oath, if he was not PUT under oath, as he should have been. Message 5962783 Moving on the next point. Even if Bush never lied in his life, I fall to see why it is worse to accuse Bush (falsely)of being a liar in the Iran-Contra case, than to accuse Clinton (equally falsely) of being a mass murderer (How many on that list? 44? 54?)? Or do you assume that any charge anyone may choose to bring up against Clinton is automatically true? And please keep the volume down...<g> jbe

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next