DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!!

DGIV 0.00

Dec 5 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jane4IceCream who wrote (29205)	10/12/1998 4:37:00 PM
From: Ronaldo	Read Replies (1) of 50264

Are you suggesting "class A shares that always win" for nice people according to JJJ and "class Z shares that always loose for bad boys #50 and bRiAn". LOL What has come clear in these past days is that you have actively lied to the people in this thread and as such, have been fully unmasked. I guess: "Jane at the beach with no truth on." I figured you made some 1,600$ to 1,700$ on DGIV today. Not much for having been soiled the way you have... I found an two old posts of yours from the original days. At that moment you were invested in the share and there was an issue with a paid article at IBD, and this made you nervous. You really do not have ethical problems...I guess you also have to pay your bills... --- To: Mike Adams (366 ) (Trial Member) From: Jane J. Jackson Thursday, Mar 19 1998 5:39PM ET Reply #373 of 7672 Mike, OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD! All you snivelling whiners take a hike please. Big deal. Do you really think the IBD article is completely carrying this stock right now? If so, I feel sorry for you. This is a BB stock. Live with it. If you feels that way about Liberty Capital, then call them up and let them know how you feel. Here's a dime for your trouble. I supposed if the sky falls tomorrow you will blame Chicken Little? Do the research and find out why this stock goes way beyond an IBD article. Jane watching the rookies play -- To: Jane J. Jackson (373 ) From: Jane J. Jackson Thursday, Mar 19 1998 5:44PM ET Reply #374 of 7672 Hello! Whether or not the company paid for the article is trivial.... The attention we all seek from just the appearance of DGIV is good to go to get new shareholders interested in DGIV. Do you think most readers are going to want to know who paid for the article?? All this debate is frivolous... And the attention that the "debaters" of this forthcoming IBD article has now brought to the thread is negative, so all you debaters can only thank yourself for attracting the negative attention. Unbelieveable!! Have some candy Jane --------- #50

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next