SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Day trading in Canada

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kevin Hamlin who wrote (823)10/12/1998 4:46:00 PM
From: keith massey  Read Replies (1) of 4467
 
I know a lot of people on this thread are not but big T.A fans - however IMHO being able to identify regular patterns on medium and short term charts can be a huge benefit to your trading.

A good write up for beginners on Elliott wave formation - it is a short but informative read. I have seen this type of formation again and again in the stocks that we often talk mention.

Going up
tradingtech.com

Going down
tradingtech.com

Best Regards
KEITH

Kevin - I always thought the only difference between a brokered and non-brokered private placement was that the company sets up non-brokered P.P's themselves, does the proper exchange paper work themselves and save on broker fees. Broker fees can often be 10-15% of the total P.P which is fairly costly.

Most insider P.P's that I have seen are non-brokered. In addition most non-brokered P.P's only involve one or two people. I don't think the size of the P.P doesn't make a difference if it is brokered or non-brokered.

I think in brokered P.P's the company decides that it want to do a P.P for X amount of dollars. The brokerage then goes out and finds people willing to take down a chunk of the P.P and gets paid for its work. You often see brokered P.P's involving 20 or more people.

That is how I have always thought it worked - can anyone correct me?

Best Regards
KEITH

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext