McClam,
Rudedog seems to feel MS's products could, should, and must become better,...
I agree with Rudedog. Whether it will happen, however, is an open question, and I won't pretend to have the answer. I'm pretty skeptical, though, because of MSFT's mgmt. and their history.
IMO, MSFT's vision of computing was molded by their experience with IBM & they still have some of IBM's old habits. Beyond that, they have no credible answer for thin client technology, which will soon provide cheaper, equally powerful computing appliances for home & office, and they have no answer for Java.
In the unlikely event that anyone in Redmond would listen to my advice, I would say: stick to the knitting and produce high- quality, portable, personal productivity applications & make that the core business. Forget about high-end servers & enterprise systems & trying to continually bind users of your applications to your O/S & ever-bigger PC hardware.
Thin clients have already dropped PC margins drastically, so that 40% of those sold now are under $1000. That trend will continue to gouge the margins of PC hardware, peripheral & software makers.
I can't comment on MSFT's other businesses and their prospects for success, because I don't know anything about them. I wouldn't buy MSFT at the current p/e of 50+, and I think it will be difficult to increase as long as their eps is around $2.00/year. However, if MSFT is betting the farm on NT 5.0, I would sell now.
JMHO, not intended to be investment advice.
cheers,
cherylw |