SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : and there was no one left to speak for me

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: INFO_DART who wrote ()10/13/1998 4:10:00 PM
From: INFO_DART  Read Replies (3) of 276
 
To: Jill McKinney or SI Bob Sent VIA email October 1,1998 From: InfoDart

Jill, Thank you for your response to my email asking what happened to my account. No one had contacted me or said anything, it just went dead.

I know your are busy, and probably have not been aware of my efforts with SI Bob to improve the quality of dialog on SI. We have assisted each other in the past. You probably didn't have an opportunity to see the context in which my new thread was made. Although, you must have noticed that there was no improper language.

I was trying doing what I thought SI wanted. That is, move William W. Dwyer, Jr. and len's "off topic" posts from the business section of SI to the Coffee Shop.

Please note that William W. Dwyer, Jr. and len have been on, as they called it themselves, a campaign, "to haunt and torment (me) at (their) pleasure. "

Jill, Indeed, that is what William W. Dwyer, Jr. and len have done. I was just trying to find a way to be able to have a decent conversation on my investment threads and limit their harassment of me to the coffee shop. That is why I created that thread. I apologize if it was a mistake.

If you don't have time to review this matter, as I document below, please refer it to Bob, as he knows my history.

********************

To: Len (142 )
From: William W. Dwyer, Jr.
Saturday, Sep 19 1998 5:28PM ET
Reply # 143 of 254

Info Idiot is offensive and a disgrace to everyone else on S.I. This "person" asked me questions, yet refuses to answer mine. I expect better, and feel his actions allow me to HAUNT and TORMENT him at my pleasure .

Ref: Message 5793407

To: William W. Dwyer, Jr. (143 )
From: Len
Saturday, Sep 19 1998 5:47PM ET
Reply #144 of 254

Hey, just a minute there, you scum sucking mother@#*?%@*
douchebag penis head!!!

He may be those things, but he's MINE I tell ya, MY, offensive,
disgraceful,(and hypocritical, duplicitous, condescending,
arrogant, self-absorbed, delusional, controlling, pompous,
immature, childish, infantile, lying, promise-breaking,
knock-kneed, bow-legged, fat, skinny, hairy, hygiene-free, STOP!!!
I'm getting carried away) small, small man.

Care to best that.
Len

Message 5793474

AND,

Talk : Market Trends : Technical Analysis - Predictive Systems for the Scientist

To: INFO_DART (0 )
From: William W. Dwyer, Jr.
Saturday, Sep 26 1998 9:49PM ET
Reply # 1 of 47

INFO IDIOT: You are starting yet another ridiculous thread on
S.I.? Man, how many threads do you think you're allowed? Do you
think everyone wants to keep seeing your wasted crap all over the
place?

You've started more threads here than anyone I know. They all are
pretty much completely off-topic with everything that relates to S.I.
You are wasting so much valuable space here, taking up so much
of our time. You're useless and add nothing to S.I. Why don't you
give it a break for a while, huh?

Your threads do no good, your messages make no useful point. And
you, personally, never answer anyone's remarks to you. Well, if
they suck up to you, you sometimes do. Otherwise, your threads go
nowhere.

Why don't you try to do some trading of your own, spend some
time in the markets, and leave S.I. for people who have something
worth saying?

This new thread you have is absolutely pointless. Let it go!!!

Ref: Message 5850294

Jill, then continue reading his and impristines posts on this Market Trends thread. Subject 23029 . These people just delight in being obnoxious and preventing me from starting a serious and scientificTechnical Analysis thread. BTW, this is not the first time impristine has done this to me. However, that was in the Coffee Shop. Ref: Message 5566115 .

AND,

Talk : Brokers/Resources : WOW - The Legal Recourse Thread

To: anyone (2 )
From: Len
Saturday, Sep 19 1998 8:10PM ET
Reply # of 11

The thread originator doesn't
like me, so he wouldn't have wanted me to help. Besides, he likes
to make much more out of things than necessary, he may decide to
'invent' his own rules.

Consider, for instance, this from his profile:

Developing an automated real-time decision support, data
acquisition and execution system, that among other things,
capitalizes on reliable individual differences in quoting and
trading behavior among individual NASDAQ Market Makers to to
yield an intraday trading advantage that can be quantified to a
scientific certainty.

Any clue as to what he means? He's way too smart for me. It looks
like he wants to trade stocks and make a profit, but wants to know
all the MM's secrets. Do I almost get it?

Ref: Message 5793996

Talk : Brokers/Resources : WOW - The Legal Recourse Thread

To: anyone (6 )
From: Len
Saturday, Sep 19 1998 8:43PM ET
Reply # 8 of 11
And in Mr. DART's case, a virtual human being. Just kidding.
Really, though, perhaps a virtual member of the intelligensia. He
pontificates, belittles, denigrates, and yet, when challenged, he
becomes silent.

If you're interested in some entertainment, check out
Subject 22850, and
begin at post #65 or so, to the present.

Message 5794098

To: Len (8 )
From: William W. Dwyer, Jr.
Sunday, Sep 20 1998 12:00PM ET
Reply # 9 of 11

Len,
This thread clearly has potential. I think "Anyone" should lead it.
Bill
Message 5796046

AND,

To: INFO_DART (170 )
From: William W. Dwyer, Jr.
Sunday, Sep 20 1998 8:00PM ET
Reply # 177 of 254
INFO IDIOT: "Not your biggest priority right now"?? To do what
you already said you would do? Obviously. Your biggest priority
is to avoid my post and continue with your crap. We all fully
expected that. Isn't it funny, though, how much time you apparently
had to post all your other pointless crap here today? Do you have a
major "time management" problem, perhaps?? Or, just a major
deficiency of credibility and integrity?

You continue to "attempt" to b.s. us all here with your pitiful
excuses, continuing to avoid anything you do not like, avoiding
doing what you already offer to do. You are not a man. You're
more like Bill Clinton. And he's not worth wasting any more than
one sentence on.

I know you'll never respond to me, you'll never answer my
questions. You know it. Everyone else here knows it, too. I just
wanted to see how you would attempt to explain it. And, as we
see, you do it pitifully, as you do everything else. I haven't seen
you write anything yet that was meaningful or in any way important
or relevant. You cannot keep your word. You have no credibility.
Notwithstanding your endless remarks to the contrary, you are
nothing.

And, until you provide us all with the information you already
offered, anything else you say will be disregarded as just so much
b.s. Thanks for confirming everything I already said about you.

You're just a crock of you-know-what, dude!!!!!!! By the way, if
you're going to "make yourself less available," how about doing us
all a favor and leaving forever???!!!??? Would be a kind and
gracious gesture on your part.

Message 5798097

William W. Dwyer, Jr.

Just a few of his many posts directed at harassing me.


128 Message 5788859
130 Message 5788941
134 Message 5789565
140 Message 5793161
143 Message 5793407
147 Message 5793720
164 Message 5795549
166 Message 5795937
9 Message 5796046
Talk : Brokers/Resources: WOW - The Legal Recourse Thread
177 Message 5798097
180 Message 5798438
188 Message 5799216
14 Message 5809427
Thread Philosophy of Discourse
2 Message 5809460
Thread Maven
194 Message 5844173

1 Message 5850294
Talk : Market Trends : Technical Analysis - Predictive Systems for the Scientist
198 Message 5845825
200 Message 5846804
209 Message 5851114
229 Message 5871531

LEN

A link to just a few of LEN's many posts directed at harassing me.
Message 5848313 .

Len, in his own words admits his purpose is to harass me.

"In answer to your repeated questions here, as to what I have been
doing, my answer is that I have been showing anyone interested
what a pathetic man you truly are. Here's some ad hominens for
you...you are a hypocritical, duplicitous, extremely immature,
self-absorbed, deluded, most likely depressed and self-hating,
small, small, man."

It wasn't enough for him to do it in the coffee shop, but he had to fulfill his mission on other threads as
well. Jill, for the most part my response to him was, "Do you have anything else to say?"

**

Jill, I don't know what William W. Dwyer told you but there must be some way for you to CONFIRM FOR YOURSELF that what he says should not be accepted on face value.

For example, he says that, "Info Dart has been "offed" before for particularly violent behavior."
Your own records should show that is another one of his lies, and that I have never been "offed," and said or did anything violent.

Ref: Message 5872977

AND, HE SAID:

"For anyone who does not know why Info Dart was terminated last
night, it is because, despite numerous warnings from S.I., he
repeatedly violated the published Silicon Investor Terms of Use"
"Make no mistake, Info Dart was warned and warned again. He
made many private messages to individuals here threatening them
in a criminal manner. He is fortunate to have only been sanctioned
as he was. He could be subject to further, more formal prosecution."
Ref: Message 5878159 .

Your own records must show that this is another one of his lies. SI has never warned me about anything nor said anything remotely criminal.

And,

"Yes, Info Dart has been "offed" before for particularly violent
behavior, bordering on criminal behavior. He is, as they say, a
multi-offender. No one should be surprised to see him gone. He
repeatedly violated the S.I. Terms of Use and was particularly
offensive, threatening, and vulgar in his replies to Len." Message 5872977 .

SI's own records must show, I was never warned about anything and that I sent no private "messages to individuals here threatening them in a criminal manner." Finally, your records must show that I never sent William W. Dwyer, Jr.any Private Mail whatsoever.

Jill, SI has been tricked by William W. Dwyer, Jr. I would appreciate it if you would return my account to proper full member status and take whatever action you believe is appropriate regarding William W. Dwyer, Jr., and Len.

Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext