Ask Michael Burke Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (33860)	10/13/1998 11:34:00 PM
From: Joan Osland Graffius	Read Replies (1) of 132070

MM, Re: Intel. I think Intel management is panicking. They are chasing the clone makers - a lesson they should have learned from IBM in the 70's and 80's where they never rolled over to the clone makers with the large mainframes. IBM did not have to in order to keep their customers and Intel did not have to. They more than likely could have "marketed" the clone makers out of business. I am watching them trying to diversify, and I thought we learned this lesson in the 70's. Also, I think it was a mistake to push out the 68 bit processor. Maybe their engineering could not make it happen, but I think they had the "marketing clout" to bring it to market and do in the 64 bit companies. Could be another Harvard case study if they don't get back to their knitting.<ggg> I was looking at their numbers--they are stinking out the house. Just some of my current thoughts on Intel. Joan

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next