Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 36.26

+0.5%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Joseph Pareti who wrote (66832)	10/16/1998 8:30:00 AM
From: gnuman	Read Replies (2) of 186894

Joseph Pareti, re:<I believe Intel cited high costs like SRAM. > COS on a Y/Y basis became a much higher percentage of revenues in Q3'98. And this is probably attributed in large part to the higher costs associated with PII, as Intel stated. But won't PII always have higher costs than Pentium due to the nature of the beast? The point I was trying to make is that a critical review of Q3 may lead to opinions not shared by the majority of this thread. This could partly explain the market reaction to Intel's quarter. As for Pfizer, I know nothing about them so I really can't comment.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next