Bux:
Anohter person, I think it was Michael, spoke about the vibrating pager. I don't even know a patent number and I asked for one.
The Q's attorneys may not have limited it, however, one cannot patent all standards, either known or unknown. As you should know, patenting what is unknown can read on both 112-1st and 112-2nd. The 1st paragraph for lack of disclosure and the 2nd paragraph for vague and indefiniteness. Clearly, you are misinformed. In re Zletz states (to paraphrase) that claims during examination are to be interpretted as broadly as possible. end of In re Zletz. However, in the court system, the claims of an invention are often given a narrow interpretation and the Q and whomever will battle over whether the claimed invention was enabling for high bandwidth applications.
I really don't care about your investments in the Q. Personally, most everyone would be better investing in an Index 500, say Vanguard Index 500 (but that is another topic)
Michael, unlike you Bux, has challenged me. I asked for patent Nos. He gave them to me. He, even though he isn't a patent attorney, made some pretty good arguments. Your last past (ie hose) was very good.
You are tiring of me b/c I am right. You are the one bringing up supposition and if this, or if that.
dave |
