SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 48.59-1.3%Feb 4 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joseph Pareti who wrote (66832)10/16/1998 11:25:00 AM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Joe, What Gene P. said: >with these outstanding shipments and
>the record breaking Q3
>revenues we have lower earnings on a Y/Y basis.

What you replied: wasn't this Kurlak's question at the con call ?
I believe Intel cited high costs like SRAM.


First, what Gene said is not true. Intel netted slightly more 3Q98 than they did in 3Q97. From Intel's press release page:

Net income in the third quarter was $1.6 billion, essentially flat
with the third quarter of 1997.


That was 3Q98. Here's 3Q97:

Net income in the third quarter was $1.57 billion, up 20
percent from third quarter 1996...


Love companies that keep old earnings reports hanging around on their web pages.

Re: "wasn't this Kurlak's question at the con call ?
I believe Intel cited high costs like SRAM."

You're right. Tom's question and Intel's (Paul Otellini) answer. I tossed in Tom's second Q&A also, in case anyone missed it.

- Kurlak...if revenues were up so much YOY, why were profits
only up a cent per share. Paul...SECC components cost reason
again (SRAM). Bye Tom (ed).


- Kurlak again (later)...how do 4Q orders look? Paul...continuing at very strong rate as exiting 3Q.


I have some stuff on Pfizer's rebound. Look for another post.

Tony
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext