SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MikeM54321 who wrote (7157)10/16/1998 1:04:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (3) of 9980
 
Mike, I am of the "general" opinion that big ships do not turn on a dime. When they do, they can cause unexpected market dislocations. Initially, the Feds signaled that they will move gradually from a restrictive stance to an easing stance (which in view of the restrictive fiscal policy, is, IMHO, the correct stance), now they have suddenly signaled an "urgency" in the turn. That will cause many participants not ready to adjust that rapidly and thus, while the urgency might have been to alleviate some problems with over extended lenders (and thus reluctancy to further lend?), the sudden change will not allow for gradual change in positions (which can be absorbed by the markets) but sudden dumping of securities on the wrong side. That would be the "miscalculation", instead of stabilizing the markets, it might actually amplify the "misjudgments" of some of the lenders.

Zeev
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext