Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (9833)	10/16/1998 3:07:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (3) of 67261

So, aren't you applying moral judgement, while clarifying that your's doesn't match his? Yes and no. I am merely presenting my opinion on this, an opinion thread. What Falwell is doing (or trying to do), is to deny me the ability to see certain works by a world renown photographer simply because Falwell thinks they are pornographic. Mapplethorpe is an artist, he is not a pornographer. If Falwell, or Falwells family doesnt like what Mapplethorpe has to say then just dont go see the exhibit is my advice. So imo, my resentment of Falwell vs. what Falwell is trying to do to the art world are two different things. Michelle

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next