SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Vidikron Technologies Group (VIDIC)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Spyder who wrote (752)10/16/1998 7:58:00 PM
From: jbIII  Read Replies (2) of 782
 
Spyder,

Correct me if I'm wrong, I believe the posted trade price is actual
MM trade price.


Essentially that's correct and the last trade posted is the MM price, but the only way to know if that is a MM buying or selling is to compare it to the last reported Bid/Ask. Like today, the last trade
posted for PJTV is at .063 with the Bid at .031 and the Ask at .063. This means that some customer bought shares from a MM at .063. But some MM would only pay .031 to buy those same share's back.

The point I was trying to make is when one day the close is .03 and the next day the close is .09 , well there really isn't a 200% increase for customers because no one actually bought at .03 and sold at .09. The best that they could have done was buy at .06 and sell at .06 or the worst case was Buy at .09 and sell at .03.

Sometimes there can be some confusion in the actual price someone may pay or get if there are more than 1 M&M. If there are several M&M's then the posted Bid will be the lowest of all their bids and the posted Ask will be the highest of them all. So the posted values may are not necessarily be from the same M&M.

The next problem is if someone places an "At Market" order. M&M's can and will momentarily raise their sell price or lower their buy price to accommodate a buyer/seller that is willing to pay/take more or less to guarantee a trade as soon as possible. Sometimes these "At Market" orders won't have been reflected in the Bid/Ask but could show an artificial high/low on a chart or closing price.

Never ever place an "At Market" order, you are at their mercy or lack of it.

A classic example is from a junior mining stock I follow, last summer they posted some huge find and the stock had a run up from .10 to .40 or .50. Naturally their numbers were questioned and SEC suspended trading for a week. While suspended there was several news stories and lots of hype. So when trading resumed on the Pink Sheets lots of people put in At Market orders and paid 1.50 to 1.75 , a few sold on the way up but no one sold at the peak and eventually the bottom fell out and it's back at .20 still waiting to prove the numbers.

Hope this helps,
jb3
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext