SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer who wrote (39518)10/16/1998 11:59:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (1) of 1578510
 
I'm new here, but long on AMD, and that is all that matters. I have noticed there are a few pro-INTC, anti-AMD people here, and all I can say is they need to get a life, or realize AMD is for real now.

I don't know if this link has been posted yet, but it is another great read of the K7. eet.com
I'll quote the juiciest part here:
“If I were Intel, I would be a little nervous"
"Asked by one engineer to quantify the K-7's advantage over Pentium II processors in terms of floating point, Diefendorff said, “there certainly will be applications where it delivers 2x [i.e., double] on a per-clock basis. If AMD is able to achieve the 500-MHz performance goal — and they seem very very confident of that — then you just about are not going to do any better than this in an X86 architecture."

If AMD can keep up the production triumphs it has had lately, and sustain them through '99, especially when the K7 is scheduled to come out, they will pose a serious threat to Intel's yearly growth rate. Jerry HAS failed in the past, but things are looking the best now.

Is there any way to post a message without directly replying to someone?
Thanks
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext